Sky Vegas
Pros
Cons
Rating Breakdown
Every criterion of our published 100-point method, with the points it earned here and the fact that produced them. Criteria we have not measured are marked Not assessed and take no part in the score — they are not counted as zero, and they are not filled with what Sky Vegas says about itself.
Assessed so far: 26 of 100 points, of which this casino earned 12.
| CRITERION | POINTS | WHAT DECIDED IT |
|---|---|---|
| 01 · Bonuses nothing assessed of 20 | ||
| Wagering requirement | — | Not assessed: no welcome offer with terms read on a dated snapshot. |
| Cash-out cap & expiry | — | Not assessed: bonus terms not read yet. |
| Terms you can actually read | — | Not assessed: bonus terms not read yet. |
| Value at a normal deposit | — | Not assessed: minimum qualifying deposit not read yet. |
| 02 · Games 0/6 assessed of 20 | ||
| Library & provider mix | — | Not assessed: no studio list or title count read from the operator's own pages. |
| RTP transparency | 0/6 | No return-to-player figure or policy published anywhere on the pages we captured. |
| Live dealer | — | Not assessed: the live lobby could not be read without an account. |
| Demo play before deposit | — | Not assessed: demo play not tried on this lobby yet. |
| 03 · Payouts nothing assessed of 20 | ||
| Withdrawal time, measured | — | Not assessed: we have not withdrawn our own money from this casino. |
| Fees & limits | — | Not assessed: the banking pages we captured state neither a withdrawal fee nor a limit. |
| Verification | — | Not assessed: no list of documents is published on the pages we captured. |
| Method coverage | — | Not assessed: the site lists deposit methods without saying which of them pay out. |
| 04 · Security 12/20 assessed of 20 | ||
| Licence found in a public register | 6/6 | Domain found in the UKGC register against Bonne Terre Gaming Limited, checked Aug 26, 2026. |
| Regulatory action in the last 5 years | 4/4 | No enforcement action published against this licensee in the five years to Sep 9, 2026. |
| Ownership transparency | 2/4 | A licensee company is named, but the account number in the footer does not confirm it. |
| Complaint route | 0/3 | No ADR body named on the pages we read, and this brand is not in the IBAS directory either. |
| Independent testing | 0/3 | No testing house named. |
| 05 · Mobile nothing assessed of 10 | ||
| Loading & stability | — | Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here. |
| Doing the job on a phone | — | Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here. |
| App parity | — | Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here. |
| 06 · Support nothing assessed of 10 | ||
| First response, timed | — | Not assessed: scored from three timed live-chat contacts, which we have not made here. |
| Answer quality | — | Not assessed: scored from three timed live-chat contacts, which we have not made here. |
| Channels & hours | — | Not assessed: no contact route read from the operator's own help pages yet. |
Who you are actually playing with
A casino brand is not a company. Sky Vegas is operated by Bonne Terre Gaming Limited, and that company — not the brand on the homepage — is the party holding your money, answering a complaint and appearing in the regulator's records. Its oldest active UKGC licence has run since November 2024.
Other sites run by the same company
These 5 domains are registered to Bonne Terre Gaming Limited in the same register entry. This matters for three practical reasons: a self-exclusion applied by the operator normally covers all of them, your verification documents are usually recognised across them, and a “different casino” offering you a fresh welcome bonus may be the same company you already have an account with.
Sister brands we have reviewed
One other brand in our catalogue is operated by Bonne Terre Gaming Limited. Their reviews are built from the same register entry and carry the same enforcement record as this page, because a penalty lands on the company rather than on the brand name.
Trading names on the same licence
Names Bonne Terre Gaming Limited has registered with the regulator. A name missing from this list is not proof of anything — operators only have to register the ones they trade under — but a name that is here can be tied to this licence.
Regulatory action on record
No published Gambling Commission enforcement case is tied to the company behind Sky Vegas in the feed we mirror. That is a clean record in the regulator's own published cases — it is not a statement that nothing has ever gone wrong, and it does not cover complaints settled privately or matters still open.
Where these facts come from
Everything above about the offer, the payment methods and the studios was read from Sky Vegas's own pages on the date below — not from another review site, and not from a press release. The page is fingerprinted so we can prove what it said on the day we read it, because the same URL serves different content on different visits.
| Page read | https://www.skyvegas.com/ |
| Date of the copy we read | Aug 25, 2026 |
| How we reached it | Fetched directly from the operator's site. |
| UK version confirmed | No — treat currency-specific figures with caution |
| SHA-256 of that page | 3a11c864f872e40809d914b903cb35a4822832fb2ab8b731547a0d424f6c7f60 |
How we verified this
Our test protocol has 9 checks. On Sky Vegas we have run 1, and 8 are still untested — printed below as such. An untested line is never left blank and never counts as a pass: under our evidence rule, the criteria it feeds are not scored at all until we have done it, and their points leave the total this casino is scored out of.
- Method
- We look the domain up in our own mirror of the regulator's public register — not on the operator's site, where the claim costs nothing to make.
- Result
- Found: Bonne Terre Gaming Limited, account 65519 — 2 active licence(s).
- Artefact
- UKGC public register snapshot of 24 Aug 2026 (2,658 licensed businesses, sha256 974838837f9d). source
- Run by
- Automated register match (registry:match-operators)
- Method
- We register as a normal player, pass whatever verification is asked at sign-up, and deposit our own money — never a comped or affiliate-funded balance.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the payouts points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- The amount, the method and the date, printed below. Cashier confirmation kept on file.
- Method
- One withdrawal, timed from the moment the request is submitted to the moment funds land — including any pending period the casino applies. The clock is not stopped for weekends.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the payouts points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- Both timestamps, the elapsed time and the method used.
- Method
- We record the date of every document request against the date of the withdrawal request.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the payouts points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- The list of documents asked for and the day each was requested.
- Method
- The full terms page is read on the date shown, and four numbers are pulled out: wagering basis and multiplier, max bet while wagering, cash-out cap and expiry.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the bonuses points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- The four numbers, the date they were read, and a link to the terms page they came from.
- Method
- We count titles and live tables in the logged-in lobby ourselves, on the date shown, rather than repeating the number in the operator's footer.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the games points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- Our count, the operator's claim, and the gap between them.
- Method
- RTP is configurable by the operator, so one number lies. We open the game's own info panel at this casino and compare it with the provider's published default for the same title.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the games points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- Both figures and the title they were read from.
- Method
- Three chats at three different times of day, each opened with a question that has a checkable answer in the terms. We time the first human reply and grade the answer against those terms.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the support points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- Three response times, the median, and how many answers were correct.
- Method
- A 20-minute session on a named mid-range Android over 4G: deposit, withdrawal, live chat and deposit limits all reached from the phone.
- Result
- Not tested yet. Nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the mobile points that depend on it are not scored — they are taken out of the total, not counted as a failure.
- Would produce
- The device and OS used, time to an interactive lobby, and anything that broke.
Protocol version 1.0, last changed 2 August 2026 — the same 9 checks are printed on every casino review, in this order, whether we passed them or not. We re-run them at least every 90 days. Read the protocol in full on how we rate.
What the operator's own documents say
Every line below was read from Sky Vegas's own banking, help and terms pages on 25 August 2026, and each page was stored with a checksum so the reading can be re-checked. Nothing here is our own measurement: it is what the casino publishes about itself, which is a different and weaker kind of evidence.
| GAMSTOP | Not named on the pages we read |
THE PAGES THIS TABLE WAS READ FROM (1)
The brand that made us build an archive layer
Sky Vegas is one of the two brands in this catalogue that exist here because of the web archive. The live site answered our reader with a geo-block rather than a page, and instead of guessing we pulled the most recent archived capture that passed the British-edition check and read the licence number out of its footer: <strong>65519</strong>.
That number then went into the register, where it resolves to <strong>Bonne Terre Gaming Limited</strong> with active casino and bingo licences — the same licensee as Sky Casino, Sky Bingo and Sky Poker. An archived fact cross-checked against a live register is a usable fact; an archived fact on its own is only a historical one.
We say this out loud on the page rather than burying it, because the alternative is what the market normally does with a geo-blocked brand: describe it from a competitor's page and print no source at all. The provenance block on this review carries the archive URL and the capture date so you can open exactly what we read.
It is also the reason a British exit point is the single most valuable thing this project could add. Sky Vegas is one of nine brands here where an unblocked reader would turn twenty-six assessed points into something we could actually score.
What the register says, and what it does not
Bonne Terre Gaming Limited, account 65519, holds two active licences: casino and bingo. Six domains sit under it — skyvegas.com, skycasino.com, skybingo.com, skypoker.com and the mobile variants — and the trading names in the register read as you would expect: Sky Vegas, Sky Casino, Sky Bingo, Sky Poker, Sky Bet Games.
No published enforcement case is tied to that licensee in our mirror of the Commission feed. Nine other brands in this catalogue cannot say the same, so it is worth the four points our method gives it — with the usual caveat that the feed covers published settlements and statements, not private complaints or open investigations.
What the register cannot tell you is anything about the product: how quickly the operator pays, what the wagering requirement is, whether verification is quick or painful, whether support answers at night. Those are operator disclosures, and they are precisely what a geo-block keeps from us.
It is a useful demonstration of what a register is for. It settles identity and standing conclusively, and it settles nothing about quality.
Twenty-six points, and where the other seventy-four sit
Scored: licence, enforcement record, ownership transparency, complaint route, independent testing and RTP transparency. The last three of those score zero — we looked and found no ADR provider, no testing house and no RTP policy published on the material available to us.
Unassessed: the entire bonus block (twenty points), the games block beyond RTP, payouts, verification, method coverage, mobile behaviour, and support response times. That is not a judgement on any of them. It is a statement that we have not read them.
Our threshold for publishing a score is forty assessed points, and the reasoning is in the <a href="/how-we-rate">rating method</a>: a figure derived from a quarter of the criteria describes our access, not the casino, and it would reward operators that block readers.
For comparison, the brands in this catalogue that do publish everything sit between 5.2 and 7.2 out of ten with fifty to seventy points assessed. A published score here would be an invention; an unrated label with the assessed figure printed next to it is the truth.
Practical checks if you are signing up
Read the current terms yourself. Everything on this page about the offer, the payouts and the verification process is deliberately absent, and an archived capture from some months ago is not a safe substitute for the terms you will actually be bound by.
Verify the footer licence number against the register. It should read 65519 in the name of Bonne Terre Gaming Limited; our <a href="/licence-check">licence check tool</a> resolves it in a couple of seconds.
Ask support for the ADR provider before you need one, and ask whether RTP figures are published per game. Neither answer was available to us and both are things a casino can answer immediately.
Treat the Sky brands as one operator for account purposes: a limit, an exclusion or a verification decision applied at licensee level covers all of them. For a block that covers every British operator at once, use <a href="/guides/gamstop-and-self-exclusion">GAMSTOP</a>.
Licensing & Security
Held by Bonne Terre Gaming Limited, account 65519.
- Bingo · Remote · 065519-R-339675-002 from 18 Nov 2024
- Casino · Remote · 065519-R-339675-002 from 18 Nov 2024
Checked 26 Aug 2026 against the UK Gambling Commission public register, snapshot taken 24 Aug 2026 (2,658 licensed businesses).
A brand we could only reach through the web archive: the geo-block sent our reader away, an archived capture gave us the licence number, and the register confirmed it as Bonne Terre Gaming Limited, account 65519, with no published enforcement case. Everything downstream of the licence is unread, twenty-six of a hundred points are assessed, and no score is published.
Sky Vegas FAQ
Casinos like Sky Vegas
Picked by what the two catalogues have in common — the studios behind the lobby, the payment methods, the shape of the welcome offer — not by which casino scores highest. The line under each name says what the overlap is.
Or open the index of all 29 casino reviews, where every page carries the same nine checks and the date each one was run.
Player reviews
We do not publish player reviews for Sky Vegas, because we have none we can stand behind. A review section is easy to fill and almost impossible to verify — unverified submissions are the single most gamed part of this industry, in both directions. Until we can tie a review to a real account, this space stays empty rather than borrowed or invented.
Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission when you sign up via our links — this never affects our scores. Gambling can be addictive; please play responsibly. GAMSTOP · BeGambleAware.org