Mr Vegas
scored
We publish a welcome offer only after reading its full terms on the operator's own UK page on a recorded date. We have not managed that for Mr Vegas yet, so there is no figure to quote and no link to follow — the rest of the review stands on the licence, the register and the documents we could read.
Mr Vegas scores by area
Full breakdown — all 26 criteria and the fact that decided each one
| CRITERION | POINTS | WHAT DECIDED IT |
|---|---|---|
| 01 · Bonuses nothing assessed of 20 | ||
| Wagering requirement | — | Not assessed: no welcome offer with terms read on a dated snapshot. |
| Cash-out cap & expiry | — | Not assessed: bonus terms not read yet. |
| Terms you can actually read | — | Not assessed: bonus terms not read yet. |
| Value at a normal deposit | — | Not assessed: minimum qualifying deposit not read yet. |
| 02 · Games nothing assessed of 20 | ||
| Library & provider mix | — | Not assessed: 23 studios are named on the site, but we have not counted the library ourselves. |
| RTP transparency | — | Not assessed: the operator's own pages have not been read for an RTP statement yet. |
| Live dealer | — | Not assessed: the live lobby could not be read without an account. |
| Demo play before deposit | — | Not assessed: demo play not tried on this lobby yet. |
| 03 · Payouts nothing assessed of 16 | ||
| Withdrawal time, measured | — | Not assessed: we have not withdrawn our own money from this casino. |
| Fees & limits | — | Not assessed: the banking pages we captured state neither a withdrawal fee nor a limit. |
| Verification | — | Not assessed: no list of documents is published on the pages we captured. |
| Method coverage | — | Not assessed: the site lists deposit methods without saying which of them pay out. |
| 04 · Security 23/29 assessed of 32 | ||
| Licence found in a public register | 6/6 | Domain found in the UKGC register against Videoslots Limited, checked 25 October 2026. |
| Regulatory action in the last 5 years | 0/4 | 2 cases on the regulator's register, most recent 20 November 2025, largest £2,000,000. Scores 0: inside the three-year window. |
| Licence tenure | 5/5 | Licensed since 1 November 2014, which is 12 years on the register. |
| Licence record kept clean | 4/4 | All 4 licences on this licensee's register entry are active. |
| Scope of the licence | 3/3 | 4 permitted activities on the register, including Bingo, Casino, General Betting Standard - Real Event. |
| Ownership transparency | 2/4 | A licensee company is named, but the account number in the footer does not confirm it. |
| Complaint route | 3/3 | IBAS named, alongside the regulator that licenses the domain. Listed in the IBAS directory as "Mr Vegas", checked 21 October 2026. |
| Independent testing | — | Not assessed: we have not been able to read this operator's own pages, so we cannot say whether it publishes an audit. Absence of evidence here is ours, not the casino's. |
| 05 · Mobile nothing assessed of 6 | ||
| Loading & stability | — | Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here. |
| Doing the job on a phone | — | Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here. |
| App parity | — | Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here. |
| 06 · Support 1/1 assessed of 6 | ||
| First response, timed | — | Not assessed: scored from three timed live-chat contacts, which we have not made here. |
| Answer quality | — | Not assessed: scored from three timed live-chat contacts, which we have not made here. |
| Channels & hours | 1/1 | email offered, without a round-the-clock commitment we could read. |
Pros
Cons
The same company as Videoslots, and why that is the useful fact
mrvegas.com resolves in the Gambling Commission register to <strong>Videoslots Limited</strong>, account 39380 — the same licensee as videoslots.com, videoslots.co.uk and megariches.com. Four domains, one company, one enforcement history.
Two brands under one licensee usually share more than they advertise: the same platform, the same payment processing, often the same terms template and the same compliance decisions. Where they differ is presentation and promotion, which is the part designed to make them look like alternatives.
The supplier list bears that out. We recorded the same twenty-three studios here as on the sister brand — NetEnt, Evolution, Big Time Gaming, Hacksaw, Push Gaming, Playtech, Microgaming, Red Tiger, Blueprint, Light & Wonder, Yggdrasil, Relax, Thunderkick, Quickspin, Playson, Wazdan, Inspired, Eyecon, Gamevy, Pariplay, Ezugi, Real Dealer and Stakelogic.
If you are choosing between the two, the choice is about interface, promotions and whichever offer you can actually read — not about which company holds your money, because that answer is the same.
Support: one channel, and what that costs
The only support channel we could confirm is e-mail, and not on a round-the-clock basis. That still earns the single channels-and-hours point, and it is worth more attention than a full mark on a one-point criterion suggests.
The moment support matters is not when you are choosing a casino; it is when a withdrawal has not arrived and the reason is unclear. At that point the difference between live chat at midnight and an e-mail queue is the difference between an answer tonight and an answer in two working days.
It is possible the site offers live chat behind a login, or on a page we could not reach — several operators do exactly that. What we can say is that we did not find one on the pages available to us, and our method scores what is published rather than what might exist.
Our own protocol has two further support criteria — first response, timed, and answer quality — and both are unassessed here. Those require an account and a real question, which is one of the checks that cannot be done from code.
The regulator's record follows the licensee
The £2 million settlement of June 2023 was against Videoslots Limited, so it applies here in full. The Commission's findings — quoted above — describe responsible-gambling reviews that were not carried out promptly, deposit and loss levels not weighed against affordability, and customers continuing to gamble after interactions that changed nothing.
A player reading that should take away one operational point: this operator has been penalised for not intervening in time, so intervention is not something to rely on. Deposit limits, loss limits and session reminders are required of every British licensee and are entirely under your control.
It is also fair to note what a settlement usually brings with it — an agreed action plan and, in several recent cases, an independent audit. The Commission publishes the failure; it does not publish the subsequent assurance work, so we score the finding and say nothing about the remediation.
It is not the only case: a further £650,000 penalty against Videoslots Limited followed in November 2025. Under our five-year rule the full four points stay lost until November 2028; from then the criterion scores two of four, and it returns to full marks only in November 2030, when the newer case leaves the window. The dates are printed next to the findings for exactly that reason.
What to settle before you deposit
Find out whether live chat exists once you are logged in. If e-mail really is the only channel, decide in advance whether that is acceptable to you — it is a reasonable trade for a good lobby, but it is a trade.
Read the welcome terms on the live British site and run them through our wagering calculator. We could not confirm a UK page, so this review deliberately carries no bonus figures at all.
The IBAS directory lists Mr Vegas, checked on 12 October 2026; ask support to confirm that ADR provider in writing all the same. Our complaints guide explains why that name is the single most useful thing to have on file before anything goes wrong.
If you already play at Videoslots, remember that this is the same licensee: verification documents, account decisions and any limits applied at company level travel between the two.
Games & studios
The 23 studios Mr Vegas names on its own pages. A studio listed here means its games are in the lobby — not which of them, or at what return.
What the operator's own documents say
Every line below was read from Mr Vegas's own banking, help and terms pages on 19 September 2026, and each page was stored with a checksum so the reading can be re-checked. Nothing here is our own measurement: it is what the casino publishes about itself, which is a different and weaker kind of evidence.
| Support channels | |
|---|---|
| GAMSTOP | Not named on the pages we read |
THE PAGES THIS TABLE WAS READ FROM (1)
Who you are actually playing with
A casino brand is not a company. Mr Vegas is operated by Videoslots Limited, and that company — not the brand on the homepage — is the party holding your money, answering a complaint and appearing in the regulator's records. Its oldest active UKGC licence has run since November 2014. Everything the register holds on it — licences, sites, trading names and any regulatory action — is on our Videoslots Limited register page.
Other sites run by the same company
These 3 domains are registered to Videoslots Limited in the same register entry. This matters for three practical reasons: a self-exclusion applied by the operator normally covers all of them, your verification documents are usually recognised across them, and a “different casino” offering you a fresh welcome bonus may be the same company you already have an account with.
Sister brands we have reviewed
One other brand in our catalogue is operated by Videoslots Limited. Their reviews are built from the same register entry and carry the same enforcement record as this page, because a penalty lands on the company rather than on the brand name.
Trading names on the same licence
Names Videoslots Limited has registered with the regulator. A name missing from this list is not proof of anything — operators only have to register the ones they trade under — but a name that is here can be tied to this licence.
Regulatory action on record
The Gambling Commission publishes the action it takes against its licensees: fines, regulatory settlements and licence suspensions. Below is every published statement we can tie to the company behind Mr Vegas, or to this site by name — not an allegation from a forum, and not our opinion, but a regulator's own record of what it found and what it cost. A fine is not automatically a reason to avoid a casino: what matters is what it was for and whether the same failure could reach your money.
| DATE | PENALTY | CASE |
|---|---|---|
| 20 November 2025 | £650,000 |
£650,000 fine for online operator Videoslots Limited
Against Videoslots Limited
|
| 15 June 2023 | £2,000,000 |
Videoslots Limited to pay £2m for regulatory failures
Against Videoslots Limited
|
An online gambling business is to pay £650,000 after a Commission investigation revealed Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and social responsibility failures.
Quoted from the Commission's own notice — £650,000 fine for online operator Videoslots Limited.
Videoslots Limited will pay £2 million after social responsibility and anti-money laundering failures were uncovered during a Commission investigation.
- not ensuring that customers displaying risk behaviours were identified as potentially experiencing harm because responsible gambling reviews were not undertaken as early, or as well, as they should have been.
- failing to identify whether a customer was at risk of experiencing harm by not considering whether the amount being deposited or lost was appropriate.
- allowing customers showing indicators of harm to continue to gamble significant amounts after interactions despite their behaviour continuing.
- not implementing its own risk-based processes appropriately due to significant delays in conducting the required action, such as an AML review or request for source of funds following a trigger in its processes.
- not fulfilling elements of customer due diligence as early as intended in accordance with its own risk-based approach.
- not having sufficient AML analysts to process the volumes of data or undertake the AML account reviews in accordance with its procedures.
Quoted from the Commission's own notice — Videoslots Limited to pay £2m for regulatory failures.
Source: the Gambling Commission's enforcement-action feed, mirrored 25 October 2026. Cases are tied to an operator through the licensee company named in the register, so a case may cover sister brands run by the same company; a statement that names this website under an earlier licensee is listed too, against the company it was made against. Where a statement divides a sum between several licensees, the figure here is the share of the licensee behind this site.
Licensing & Security
Held by Videoslots Limited, account 39380.
- Bingo · Remote · 039380-R-319311-036 from 24 June 2025
- Casino · Remote · 039380-R-319311-036 from 1 November 2014
- General Betting Standard - Real Event · Remote · 039380-R-319311-036 from 7 December 2020
- Linked Gambling Software · Remote · 039380-R-319311-036 from 26 March 2015
Checked 25 October 2026 against the UK Gambling Commission public register, snapshot taken 25 October 2026 (2,635 licensed businesses).
How we verified this
On Mr Vegas we have run 1 of the 9 checks. The other 8 are named at the bottom of this section and take no part in the score (evidence rule).
- Result
- Found: Videoslots Limited, account 39380 — 4 active licence(s).
- Artefact
- UKGC public register snapshot of 25 October 2026 (2,635 licensed businesses, sha256 0b686fe6bb45). source
- Run by
- Automated register match (registry:match-operators)
Real money deposited · Withdrawal timed end to end · When documents were demanded · Bonus terms read in full · Library counted in the lobby · RTP compared to the provider default · Live chat timed, three contacts · Twenty minutes on a real handset. None of these has been run at Mr Vegas, nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the points they feed leave the total rather than scoring zero. What each one involves, and what it would produce, is in the protocol.
Protocol 1.0 (2 August 2026) · the licence line is re-run every night · the protocol in full.
Where these facts come from
Read from Mr Vegas's own pages on the date below, and fingerprinted (why that matters).
| Page read | https://www.mrvegas.com/ |
|---|---|
| Date of the copy we read | 25 August 2026 |
| How we reached it | Fetched directly from the operator's site. |
| UK version confirmed | No — treat currency-specific figures with caution |
| SHA-256 of that page | 8518b0f2e3dba94a245146d531ef17bc6c34ba233a23cbd0ed44e4efca6f2f3e |
Mr Vegas against another casino
| Criterion | Mr Vegas | Pub Casino |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | Not scored | 8.1 / 10 |
| Points assessed | 30 of 100 | 72 of 100 |
| Welcome offer | — | 50 cash spins on Octobeer Fortunes |
| Wagering | — | No wagering |
| Deposit to start | — | £10 |
| Payout processing | — | — |
| Payment methods | — | 8 |
| Studios named | 23 | 8 |
| Licensed since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Regulator fines | 2 · £2.65m | None published |
A sister brand to Videoslots on the same licence and the same platform, with the same twenty-three-studio supply and a thinner support picture — e-mail only, on the pages we could read. The licensee's £2 million settlement from 2023 and a £650,000 penalty from November 2025 stand on the record, the British edition of the site would not open for our reader, and thirty of a hundred assessed points leaves the brand unrated here.
Mr Vegas FAQ
Casinos like Mr Vegas
Picked by what the catalogues have in common, not by which casino scores highest — the line under each name says what the overlap is.
Or open the index of all 59 casino reviews.
Player reviews
None published for Mr Vegas: we have none we can tie to a real funded account, and we would rather leave this empty than borrow or invent it (the policy in full).
No affiliate links: no operator pays us, and the link to this casino goes to its own site without a tracking tag. Gambling can be addictive; please play responsibly. GAMSTOP · GambleAware