Ladbrokes Casino logo

Ladbrokes Casino

LC International Limited · UKGC register
Not
scored
25 of 100 points assessed — below the 40 we need for a score
Passed 19 of the 25 points we could check. Bonuses, Games, Payouts, Mobile and Support are not checked yet. A score out of ten on this much would measure our coverage rather than the casino. How this works.
Licensed since
2019
7 years on the register
Regulator fines
£14m
1 published case
NO OFFER PUBLISHED HERE

We publish a welcome offer only after reading its full terms on the operator's own UK page on a recorded date. We have not managed that for Ladbrokes Casino yet, so there is no figure to quote and no link to follow — the rest of the review stands on the licence, the register and the documents we could read.

QUICK FACTS
LicenseeLC International Limited

Ladbrokes Casino scores by area

Bonuses NEEDS OUR ACCOUNT
0/0 · 0 of 20 checked
Games NEEDS OUR ACCOUNT
0/0 · 0 of 20 checked
Payouts NEEDS OUR ACCOUNT
0/0 · 0 of 16 checked
Security 7.6/10
19/25 · 25 of 32 checked
Mobile NEEDS OUR ACCOUNT
0/0 · 0 of 6 checked
Support NEEDS OUR ACCOUNT
0/0 · 0 of 6 checked
WHERE LADBROKES CASINO SITS AMONG THE CASINOS WE HAVE SCORED
Ladbrokes Casino the middle half of casinos median thin evidence
Security
7.6/10 · higher than 20 of 59 casinos scored on this · median 7.8
Drawn from the scores stored for every casino in the catalogue, not from a sample. An axis appears only when it has been assessed for this casino; a hollow dot means fewer than half of that axis's points could be checked.
Full breakdown — all 26 criteria and the fact that decided each one
All criteria behind the Ladbrokes Casino score, with points and the fact that decided each one
CRITERIONPOINTSWHAT DECIDED IT
01 · Bonuses nothing assessed of 20
Wagering requirement — Not assessed: no welcome offer with terms read on a dated snapshot.
Cash-out cap & expiry — Not assessed: bonus terms not read yet.
Terms you can actually read — Not assessed: bonus terms not read yet.
Value at a normal deposit — Not assessed: minimum qualifying deposit not read yet.
02 · Games nothing assessed of 20
Library & provider mix — Not assessed: no studio list or title count read from the operator's own pages.
RTP transparency — Not assessed: the operator's own pages have not been read for an RTP statement yet.
Live dealer — Not assessed: the live lobby could not be read without an account.
Demo play before deposit — Not assessed: demo play not tried on this lobby yet.
03 · Payouts nothing assessed of 16
Withdrawal time, measured — Not assessed: we have not withdrawn our own money from this casino.
Fees & limits — Not assessed: the banking pages we captured state neither a withdrawal fee nor a limit.
Verification — Not assessed: no list of documents is published on the pages we captured.
Method coverage — Not assessed: the site lists deposit methods without saying which of them pay out.
04 · Security 19/25 assessed of 32
Licence found in a public register 6/6 Domain found in the UKGC register against LC International Limited, checked 25 October 2026.
Regulatory action in the last 5 years 0/4 One case on the regulator's register, most recent 17 August 2022, largest £14,000,000. Scores 0: a penalty of £1m or more.
Licence tenure 3/5 Licensed since 1 July 2019, which is 7.3 years on the register.
Licence record kept clean 4/4 All 6 licences on this licensee's register entry are active.
Scope of the licence 3/3 6 permitted activities on the register, including Betting Intermediary, Bingo, Casino.
Ownership transparency — Not assessed: we have not been able to read this operator's own pages, so we cannot say what its footer names.
Complaint route 3/3 IBAS named, alongside the regulator that licenses the domain. Listed in the IBAS directory as "Ladbrokes Online", checked 21 October 2026.
Independent testing — Not assessed: we have not been able to read this operator's own pages, so we cannot say whether it publishes an audit. Absence of evidence here is ours, not the casino's.
05 · Mobile nothing assessed of 6
Loading & stability — Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here.
Doing the job on a phone — Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here.
App parity — Not assessed: measured on a real handset with a funded account, which we have not done here.
06 · Support nothing assessed of 6
First response, timed — Not assessed: scored from three timed live-chat contacts, which we have not made here.
Answer quality — Not assessed: scored from three timed live-chat contacts, which we have not made here.
Channels & hours — Not assessed: no contact route read from the operator's own help pages yet.
+

Pros

✓Licence resolves in the UKGC register to LC International Limited, account 54743, casino entitlement active
✓The register lists sixteen trading names under the same licence, so the corporate picture is unusually easy to verify
✓Six licensed activities, including both standard betting entitlements — one account covers casino and sportsbook under one licensee
✓A listed parent company means annual reports and regulatory filings exist in public, which is not true of most operators
–

Cons

✕The licensee carries the £17 million penalty from 2022, one of the two largest in this catalogue
✕Inner pages refused our reader, so withdrawal times, fees, verification rules and support hours are all unread
✕No footer account number on what we captured, so the site does not make itself checkable
✕No ADR body and no testing house found on any page we could read; the IBAS route is known only from the IBAS directory
✕Twenty-five of a hundred points assessed — below our publication threshold, so no score
SECURITY 7.6/10 19 of 25 checked points

The brand is old; the licence is what matters

Ladbrokes has been taking bets since 1886, and none of that history is a fact about the casino at ladbrokes.com. What is a fact is the register entry: the domain resolves to <strong>LC International Limited</strong>, account 54743, holding active licences for casino, bingo, pool betting, betting intermediary and both standard betting activities.

The same company holds the licences behind Coral, PartyCasino, PartyPoker, bwin, Gala Bingo, Gala Casino, Gala Spins, Foxy Bingo, Foxy Games, Cheeky Bingo, Sportingbet and Gamebookers. Fifteen domains, sixteen trading names, one licensee. If you are choosing between Ladbrokes and Coral on the basis that they are competitors, they are not — they are two shopfronts on the same licence.

The practical consequence is that the account rules are set at company level. Financial checks, account closures, source-of-funds requests and the way a complaint is escalated will look the same at both, because the same compliance function designs them.

It also means a single enforcement history. Whatever the Commission has found against LC International Limited is on the record for every brand it runs — which is why the £17 million case sits on this page.

HOW SECURITY SCORED
✓ Licence found in a public register 6/6 Domain found in the UKGC register against LC International Limited, checked 25 October 2026.
✕ Regulatory action in the last 5 years 0/4 One case on the regulator's register, most recent 17 August 2022, largest £14,000,000. Scores 0: a penalty of £1m or more.
◐ Licence tenure 3/5 Licensed since 1 July 2019, which is 7.3 years on the register.
✓ Licence record kept clean 4/4 All 6 licences on this licensee's register entry are active.
✓ Scope of the licence 3/3 6 permitted activities on the register, including Betting Intermediary, Bingo, Casino.
– Ownership transparency not assessed Not assessed: we have not been able to read this operator's own pages, so we cannot say what its footer names.
✓ Complaint route 3/3 IBAS named, alongside the regulator that licenses the domain. Listed in the IBAS directory as "Ladbrokes Online", checked 21 October 2026.
– Independent testing not assessed Not assessed: we have not been able to read this operator's own pages, so we cannot say whether it publishes an audit. Absence of evidence here is ours, not the casino's.
SECURITY 7.6/10 19 of 25 checked points

What the £17 million case says about the systems

The 2022 settlement covered social responsibility and anti-money laundering failures at both the online and land-based sides of the business. The Commission's own findings appear above; we quote rather than paraphrase because paraphrase is where affiliate sites usually start softening.

Read them and a pattern emerges that runs through most of the large cases in our mirror of the enforcement feed: the operator had alerts, and the alerts were not sensitive enough or acted on quickly enough. That is a different failure from an operator refusing to pay winnings, and it is the more common one in Britain.

For a player, the useful reading is not "this brand is dangerous" — it is "the automatic protections are a backstop, not a plan". The tools that actually work are the ones you set yourself: a deposit limit, a loss limit, a session reminder. All three are required of every British licensee, and all three are under your control rather than the operator's judgement.

The case dates from August 2022, which is inside the five-year window our rating method uses, and at £1m or more it costs the operator the full four points on the regulatory-action criterion. In August 2027 it will fall out of that window automatically. We publish the date so you can do that arithmetic yourself rather than trusting our timing.

Why there is no score on this page

A casino review is worth something only if it measures the same things for every casino. Ours measures twenty-six criteria across six axes, and on this site we could evaluate six of them — the licence, the enforcement record, licence tenure, the licence record, its scope and the complaint route. Everything that requires reading the operator's own documentation was blocked before we could read it.

That leaves twenty-five of a hundred points assessed. Below forty we withhold the score, print the assessed figure instead, and say why. It is a less satisfying page than a made-up number, and it is the only version of this page that is true.

The specific gaps are worth naming, because they are exactly the things you would want a review to tell you: the minimum withdrawal, whether withdrawals are free, how long they take, which documents verification asks for and when, whether support runs around the clock, and which safer-gambling tools are actually offered.

A UK exit point would fix most of this, and it is the single change that would move this page from twenty-five points assessed to something publishable. Until then, the honest label is "unrated", and it means unread rather than bad.

How to check the parts we could not

Open the site's banking or help page yourself and look for three numbers: the minimum withdrawal, the fee, and the stated processing time. Those three decide most of what a payout feels like. Our withdrawal times guide explains which part of the wait belongs to the casino and which to your bank.

Ask support to confirm that IBAS is their ADR provider, as its directory listing for Ladbrokes Online indicates, and write the answer down. If a payout is ever held for longer than the published time, that name is the next step after the operator's own complaints process, and it is free to use.

Expect a financial check at some point: British operators are required to look at affordability, and the thresholds are not published in most cases. Our guide to financial checks covers what they can ask for and what happens if you decline.

If you already hold a Coral or PartyCasino account, treat this as the same operator for everything except promotions — including any limits or exclusions you have set.

What the operator's own documents say

Every line below was read from Ladbrokes Casino's own banking, help and terms pages , and each page was stored with a checksum so the reading can be re-checked. Nothing here is our own measurement: it is what the casino publishes about itself, which is a different and weaker kind of evidence.

What Ladbrokes Casino's own documents say
GAMSTOP Not named on the pages we read

Who you are actually playing with

A casino brand is not a company. Ladbrokes Casino is operated by LC International Limited, and that company — not the brand on the homepage — is the party holding your money, answering a complaint and appearing in the regulator's records. Its oldest active UKGC licence has run since July 2019. Everything the register holds on it — licences, sites, trading names and any regulatory action — is on our LC International Limited register page.

Other sites run by the same company

These 14 domains are registered to LC International Limited in the same register entry. This matters for three practical reasons: a self-exclusion applied by the operator normally covers all of them, your verification documents are usually recognised across them, and a “different casino” offering you a fresh welcome bonus may be the same company you already have an account with.

bwin.com cheekybingo.com coral.co.uk foxybingo.com foxygames.com galabingo.com galacasino.com galaspins.com gamebookers.com partycasino.com partypoker.com partysports.com sportingbet.com sports.sbet.com

Sister brands we have reviewed

2 other brands in our catalogue are operated by LC International Limited. Their reviews are built from the same register entry and carry the same enforcement record as this page, because a penalty lands on the company rather than on the brand name.

Trading names on the same licence

Names LC International Limited has registered with the regulator. A name missing from this list is not proof of anything — operators only have to register the ones they trade under — but a name that is here can be tied to this licence.

bwincheeky bingocoralfoxy bingofoxy gamesgalagala bingogala casinogala coralgala spinsgame bookersladbrokesparty casinoparty pokerparty sportssporting bet

Regulatory action on record

The Gambling Commission publishes the action it takes against its licensees: fines, regulatory settlements and licence suspensions. Below is every published statement we can tie to the company behind Ladbrokes Casino, or to this site by name — not an allegation from a forum, and not our opinion, but a regulator's own record of what it found and what it cost. A fine is not automatically a reason to avoid a casino: what matters is what it was for and whether the same failure could reach your money.

1 PUBLISHED ACTION · £14M IN PENALTIES
One marker per published statement, by date; the area of a marker follows the penalty. A ring is an action with no published penalty, such as a licence suspension. The cases are listed below with the regulator's own wording.
Regulatory action on record for Ladbrokes Casino
DATEPENALTYCASE
17 August 2022 £14,000,000
its share of the £17,000,000 the statement divides between 2 licensees
Entain to pay £17 million for regulatory failures
Against LC International Limited and Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Limited
WHAT THE REGULATOR FOUND · 17 August 2022

A gambling business is to pay £17 million for social responsibility and anti-money laundering failures at its online and land-based businesses.

  • being slow to interact with, or not interacting with, certain customers in a way which minimised their risk of experiencing harms associated with gambling – the operator conducted just one chat interaction with an online customer who spent extended periods gambling overnight during an 18-month period in which they deposited £230,845
  • allowing customers subject to enquiries and restrictions to open multiple accounts with the Licensee’s other brands – one online customer who was blocked with Coral because they had spent £60,000 in 12 months and failed to provide Source of Funds (SOF) was immediately able to open an account with Ladbrokes and deposit £30,000 in a single day
  • one shop customer was not escalated for a safer gambling review by either the shop or support office teams despite staking £29,372 and losing £11,345 in a single month
  • overseeing the failure of local staff or area managers to escalate potential concerns with customers sooner – one shop customer was not escalated despite being known to be a delivery driver who had lost £17,000 in a year and another was not escalated despite staking £173,285 and losing £27,753 over the same time period.
  • failing to conduct an adequate risk assessment of the risks of their online business being used for money laundering and terrorist financing
  • allowing online customers to deposit large amounts without carrying out sufficient SOF checks – one consumer was allowed to deposit £742,000 in 14 months without appropriate SOF checks and another, who was known to live in social housing, was allowed to deposit £186,000 in six months without sufficient SOF checks
  • failing to conduct enhanced customer due diligence checks soon enough – one online customer was allowed to deposit £524,501 between December 2019 and October 2020 before the operator closed the account due to the customer failing to supply SOF evidence
  • placing excessive reliance on open-source information – one online consumer was allowed to deposit £140,700 between December 2019 and October 2020 but prior to a SOF check in August 2020, the operator based its knowledge of the customer’s source of wealth on open-source searches
  • allowing customers to stake large amounts of money without having been monitored or scrutinised – one betting shop customer was allowed to stake a total of £168,000 on shop terminals over eight months before the operator carried out due diligence checks.

Quoted from the Commission's own notice — Entain to pay £17 million for regulatory failures.

Source: the Gambling Commission's enforcement-action feed, mirrored 25 October 2026. Cases are tied to an operator through the licensee company named in the register, so a case may cover sister brands run by the same company; a statement that names this website under an earlier licensee is listed too, against the company it was made against. Where a statement divides a sum between several licensees, the figure here is the share of the licensee behind this site.

Licensing & Security

Licence verified — UKGC

Held by LC International Limited, account 54743.

  • Betting Intermediary · Remote · 054743-R-330863-015 from 1 July 2019
  • Bingo · Remote · 054743-R-330863-015 from 1 July 2019
  • Casino · Remote · 054743-R-330863-015 from 1 July 2019
  • General Betting Standard - Real Event · Remote · 054743-R-330863-015 from 1 July 2019
  • General Betting Standard - Virtual Event · Remote · 054743-R-330863-015 from 1 July 2019
  • Pool Betting · Remote · 054743-R-330863-015 from 1 July 2019

Checked 25 October 2026 against the UK Gambling Commission public register, snapshot taken 25 October 2026 (2,635 licensed businesses).

How we verified this

On Ladbrokes Casino we have run 1 of the 9 checks. The other 8 are named at the bottom of this section and take no part in the score (evidence rule).

Licence found in a public register
Is there a real licence behind this domain, and is it active today?
25 October 2026 PUBLIC REGISTER
Result
Found: LC International Limited, account 54743 — 6 active licence(s).
Artefact
UKGC public register snapshot of 25 October 2026 (2,635 licensed businesses, sha256 0b686fe6bb45). source
Run by
Automated register match (registry:match-operators)
NOT TESTED YET · 8 OF 9

Real money deposited · Withdrawal timed end to end · When documents were demanded · Bonus terms read in full · Library counted in the lobby · RTP compared to the provider default · Live chat timed, three contacts · Twenty minutes on a real handset. None of these has been run at Ladbrokes Casino, nothing on this page claims otherwise, and the points they feed leave the total rather than scoring zero. What each one involves, and what it would produce, is in the protocol.

Protocol 1.0 (2 August 2026) · the licence line is re-run every night · the protocol in full.

Where these facts come from

Read from Ladbrokes Casino's own pages on the date below, and fingerprinted (why that matters).

Where the facts about Ladbrokes Casino come from
Page readhttps://www.ladbrokes.com/
Date of the copy we read25 August 2026
How we reached it Fetched directly from the operator's site.
UK version confirmedNo — treat currency-specific figures with caution
SHA-256 of that page861ba1e98e08ec6e889315be19f0c19476227b3078cd63625c75f9e7edbe6891

Ladbrokes Casino against another casino

Ladbrokes Casino compared with another casino, point by point
CriterionLadbrokes CasinoLeoVegas
Our scoreNot scored6.0 / 10
Points assessed25 of 10045 of 100
Welcome offer——
Wagering——
Deposit to start——
Payout processing——
Payment methods—7
Studios named—20
Licensed since20192014
Regulator fines1 · £14m1 · £1.32m
EDITOR'S VERDICT

A 140-year-old betting brand running an online casino under LC International Limited, one of the largest licensed operators in Britain and the holder of one of the two biggest enforcement penalties in this catalogue. The register entry is clean and current; the site itself blocked our reader, so everything downstream of the licence — payouts, verification, support, safer-gambling tools — is unread, and we publish no score rather than guess at one.

Ladbrokes Casino FAQ

Yes. ladbrokes.com resolves in the UK Gambling Commission register to LC International Limited, account 54743, with an active casino licence.

Casinos like Ladbrokes Casino

Picked by what the catalogues have in common, not by which casino scores highest — the line under each name says what the overlap is.

Or open the index of all 59 casino reviews.

Player reviews

None published for Ladbrokes Casino: we have none we can tie to a real funded account, and we would rather leave this empty than borrow or invent it (the policy in full).

18+

No affiliate links: no operator pays us, and the link to this casino goes to its own site without a tracking tag. Gambling can be addictive; please play responsibly. GAMSTOP · GambleAware